Username:
Password:
 
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

Not A Member?

Jesus Joshua 24:15 Home  »  Forum Home  »  Everything Else  »  The Tech Corner  »  Who says you can't fix stupid?

   

AuthorTopic 

AnonJr
Absent-minded Webmaster

USA
621 Posts

Posted - 11 Nov 2007 :  11:27:22 Show Profile Reply with Quote
Sadly this has been a frequent topic at work these days - but that's another story.

What made me think about it was this rather interesting TechDirt article:

quote:

You Can't Legislate Stupidity Away... But Can You Automate It Away?
from the someone's-trying dept
by Mike Masnick
Fri, Nov 9th 2007 7:31pm

For years, we've pointed out that, as much as politicians try, you simply cannot legislate stupidity away. However, could you automate it away? Apparently that's what some programmers are working on, trying to come up with a spam filter-like system to automatically detect and quarantine "stupid" comments in forums and blog comments. As someone who spends way too much time reading the comments around here, there is some appeal in the concept of such a thing. But, the reality is that it's unlikely to work. Stupidity will no doubt route around any such filters pretty quickly. Besides, it sounds like it would really only catch the blindingly obvious stupid comments anyway, rather than the more frustrating and more common variety: which are comments from people who read what they want something to say, rather than what it actually says. What we really need is not a stupidity filter, but a comment troll filter -- or perhaps just a great big lesson in reading comprehension.



As much as I'd like to hope it can be made, I just don't see this as fixing the problem. One commenter suggested that the real problem is the constant pandering to the lowest common denominator. Others were either demonstrating their lack of reading comprehension or making ironic points - I couldn't really tell.... which is kinda the real problem with the idiot filter as it stands today.

The full article that inspired the TechDirt post is worth reading. [link]

There's no trick to being a humorist when you have the whole government working for you.
- Will Rogers

AXEMAN2415
Guitar Weenie

USA
740 Posts

Posted - 11 Nov 2007 :  12:11:47 Show Profile Reply with Quote
You know, I less and less inclined to believe that the are more stupid people, but more people who are really smart but choose the stupid things because they will not admit what their real opinions are.

Case in point: The last Democratic debate where Hillary Clinton was asked whether or not she supported the New York Governor's idea to give drivers licenses to illegal aliens. At first, she indicated she did support it, but when she was challenged, she said she "didn't say she supported the idea..."

It is true, she did not actually say the words, but she did openly indicate that she thought the idea was a sound one. I do not believe Hillary Clinton is an imbecile (although I DO believe her liberal ideas are), because she is smart enough to know that if she actually articulated her liberal ideas, the majority of Americans would not support them. She is also smart enough to know how to manipulate the outflow of information so that she appears consistent on her agenda.

I realize that this is somewhat of a rabbit trail, and really has little to do with Anon's post, but I just think that, as Forrest Gump would say, "Stupid is as stupid does." What I worry about are the smart ones.

"C'mon Dave, Gimme a break!"
Go to Top of Page

AnonJr
Absent-minded Webmaster

USA
621 Posts

Posted - 12 Nov 2007 :  06:43:17 Show Profile Reply with Quote
Penny Arcade did a comic on this (the original topic ) that suggested that its the combination of anonymity and a large audience that seems to bring out the worst in people. I'd link to it but its a little on the profane side...

As a side note, the original article mentioned that they are using the comments from YouTube to test their filters. Think they've got enough material to work with? I'm thinking the signal-to-noise ratio is going to be a little too far off to properly train the program.

There's no trick to being a humorist when you have the whole government working for you.
- Will Rogers
Go to Top of Page

Captain Blasto
Cappuccino Junkie

USA
212 Posts

Posted - 14 Nov 2007 :  23:04:52 Show Profile Visit Captain Blasto's Homepage Send Captain Blasto an AOL message Send Captain Blasto a Yahoo! Message Reply with Quote
Why censor them? I mean idiots are people too.... or is it people are idiots too? Anyway the thought of thoughts being censored via automation seems a tad Orwellian and could result in squelching some legitimate posts in the process... either unintentionally or otherwise...

President of the
Juan Valdez fanclub

Kirk Out
Go to Top of Page

Shredhead
Junior Member

Australia
322 Posts

Posted - 15 Nov 2007 :  04:04:47 Show Profile Reply with Quote
I think it's a great idea....... is the inventor Australian lol .
I wonder , is there anyway to link it to the Dept of Transport , sorry , DMV .

but some of you need to be awakened and slapped silly - William D Rauser
Go to Top of Page

AnonJr
Absent-minded Webmaster

USA
621 Posts

Posted - 15 Nov 2007 :  06:59:00 Show Profile Reply with Quote
Cap'n,

While I don't think it will ever get accurate enough to reliably filter the comments (or even come close to being reliable), I'm not sure that it would be Orwellian - with all the connotation that comes with it. Most likely if it ever sees the light of production, it will probably err on the side of caution - just like the spam filters used in a lot of e-mail services.... and we see how well that works.

Incidentally, we already have automatic filters in here to keep the spammers from registering for the forums. Is that Orwellian censorship? Many forums have a staff of moderators that prune out (most of) the stupid/off-topic/offensive/against policy posts - as stated in the terms of use for those forums - is that Orwellian censorship?

Please understand that I'm all for free speech, and I don't want to see the "thought police" spring up out of someones best intentions. On the other hand, I'd love to see people learn that there are consequences for acting like an idiot on the 'net just like there are (most of the time) in the real world.


Shreadhead,

I don't know if he's an Aussie or not, but if the DOT started to filter stupidity nothing would get done.

There's no trick to being a humorist when you have the whole government working for you.
- Will Rogers
Go to Top of Page

AXEMAN2415
Guitar Weenie

USA
740 Posts

Posted - 15 Nov 2007 :  16:55:44 Show Profile Reply with Quote
If there was a stupidity filter, there wouldn't be any Aussies, either...lol

"C'mon Dave, Gimme a break!"

Edited by - AXEMAN2415 on 15 Nov 2007 16:56:56
Go to Top of Page

Shredhead
Junior Member

Australia
322 Posts

Posted - 16 Nov 2007 :  02:09:27 Show Profile Reply with Quote
quote:
If there was a stupidity filter, there wouldn't be any Aussies, either...lol


Oh reeeeeally ?
I may be wrong , but last time I looked , Hillary Clinton was on your ballot paper

quote:
Shreadhead,

I don't know if he's an Aussie or not, but if the DOT started to filter stupidity nothing would get done.

I understand Anon ......... but couldn't the band just practice at Wills' place ?

but some of you need to be awakened and slapped silly - William D Rauser
Go to Top of Page

Captain Blasto
Cappuccino Junkie

USA
212 Posts

Posted - 16 Nov 2007 :  05:00:36 Show Profile Visit Captain Blasto's Homepage Send Captain Blasto an AOL message Send Captain Blasto a Yahoo! Message Reply with Quote
quote:
Many forums have a staff of moderators that prune out (most of) the stupid/off-topic/offensive/against policy posts - as stated in the terms of use for those forums - is that Orwellian censorship?



Ummm.... definitely could be... I mean the paramaters regarding all of those things ("the stupid/off-topic/offensive/against policy posts") can be rather subjective in the mind of the "pruner"...
and lets not forget... what of the prunee? If you don't get to see all of their posts (including their moronic posts) then you might think that we... I mean.. that THEY have a brain.... I think that an "ignore" feature is more appropriate. Then each individual can decide if they want to subject themself to the various (bufoonaries?)and other related (nonsensicalities?) ...and the like... Besides we're all guys here... We should already be well aquainted with the art of ignoring and ignorances

President of the
Juan Valdez fanclub

Kirk Out
Go to Top of Page

Shredhead
Junior Member

Australia
322 Posts

Posted - 16 Nov 2007 :  15:00:04 Show Profile Reply with Quote
quote:
Besides we're all guys here... We should already be well aquainted with the art of ignoring and ignorances

Either your couch is really comfortable , or Mrs Blasto never looks in on this forum LOL .

but some of you need to be awakened and slapped silly - William D Rauser
Go to Top of Page

AXEMAN2415
Guitar Weenie

USA
740 Posts

Posted - 16 Nov 2007 :  17:15:41 Show Profile Reply with Quote
quote:
Oh reeeeeally ?
I may be wrong , but last time I looked , Hillary Clinton was on your ballot paper


Sadly, I cannot really argue with that....EXCEPT that she hasn't won the nomination yet...so she's not on the ballot paper yet...Toilet paper, maybe, but not the ballot....

"C'mon Dave, Gimme a break!"
Go to Top of Page

Shredhead
Junior Member

Australia
322 Posts

Posted - 16 Nov 2007 :  18:04:34 Show Profile Reply with Quote
Hmmm , that could be the definitive " stupid test " . We'll wait & see if she gets elected ...... Oh , but if she does that would mean...hmm lol .

but some of you need to be awakened and slapped silly - William D Rauser
Go to Top of Page

AXEMAN2415
Guitar Weenie

USA
740 Posts

Posted - 16 Nov 2007 :  20:46:54 Show Profile Reply with Quote
quote:
We'll wait & see if she gets elected ...... Oh , but if she does that would mean...hmm lol .


Yes...it would mean that you cannot legislate stupid...you vote it in....

"C'mon Dave, Gimme a break!"
Go to Top of Page

Shredhead
Junior Member

Australia
322 Posts

Posted - 17 Nov 2007 :  16:08:52 Show Profile Reply with Quote
Sort of..... " by the stupid , for the stupid " ?

but some of you need to be awakened and slapped silly - William D Rauser
Go to Top of Page

AXEMAN2415
Guitar Weenie

USA
740 Posts

Posted - 19 Nov 2007 :  14:05:12 Show Profile Reply with Quote
We shall see just how stupid the American people are, if she wins the Presidency. But don't judge us all by the President.

"C'mon Dave, Gimme a break!"
Go to Top of Page

Shredhead
Junior Member

Australia
322 Posts

Posted - 20 Nov 2007 :  01:07:45 Show Profile Reply with Quote
I'll try not to , but we do get " COPS " down here , so it may be a bit difficult .

but some of you need to be awakened and slapped silly - William D Rauser
Go to Top of Page

AXEMAN2415
Guitar Weenie

USA
740 Posts

Posted - 20 Nov 2007 :  15:12:25 Show Profile Reply with Quote
Hmmmm....I find it interesting that you drew an association between Hillary Clinton and the police...Freudian slip?....

"C'mon Dave, Gimme a break!"
Go to Top of Page

Shredhead
Junior Member

Australia
322 Posts

Posted - 21 Nov 2007 :  01:46:18 Show Profile Reply with Quote
Nooo , I mean the tv show , COPS..... although both of the above seem to set a new benchmark for stupidity lol .

but some of you need to be awakened and slapped silly - William D Rauser
Go to Top of Page
 Topic 

   
Jump To: 

© Jesus Joshua 24:15 - A Soul Joy Records Recording Artist
Created By: Wayward Son Developers
Powered By: Snitz Forums